On Twitters, Tweeters, and tweets

Having more time at home – as I’ve already noted – means that I’m much more vulnerable to the news as it unfolds. newscast I use the term “vulnerable” here quite pointedly.  BR (before retirement) my exposure to television news was fairly limited; a few minutes in the morning while I got ready to go to work, a quick glance at an online paper at noon in case anything important had happened while I was immersed in the needs of school children, a CBC news update at 6, and The Daily Show at night.  I will admit that I was a bit thin on news-watching; understand, though, that I’m married to a news junkie so never have to fear about being too uninformed because I can absolutely count on David to keep me well informed.  Anyhow, back to SR (since retirement and also my first two initials).  I’ve been very nervously watching what’s transpiring in Iran.  Does it surprise me?  No.  So … what am I writing about here? Did you see Hilary on TV yesterday (just before she evidently fell on the way to her car in the State Department parking garage and broke her elbow; I wish her a speedy recovery)?  She was in the spotlight because of the demonstrations following the mock election in Iran.  In an unprecedented move, the US government asked Twitter to delay a planned maintenance outage because of its use as a communication tool by Iranians following their disputed election.   Twitter?  Why is it worthy of attention from the US State Department?  Well, first to that press conference; here’s an excerpt:

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday defended a US request to Twitter to postpone a planned maintenance shutdown as a way to allow Iranians to speak out and organize.

“The United States believes passionately and strongly in the basic principle of free expression,” Clinton told reporters when asked about the State Department’s request to the social networking firm Twitter.

“We promote the right of free expression,” the chief US diplomat added.

“And it is the case that one of the means of expression, the use of Twitter is a very important one, not only to the Iranian people but now increasingly to people around the world, and most particularly to young people,” she said.

“I wouldn’t know a twitter from a tweeter, but apparently it is very important,” she said, sparking laughter.

Until very recently I didn’t know very much about social media (I’m still quite limited, although terms like MySpace, Facebook, Wiki, YouTube (did I tell you I’ve even got videoclips of  excerpts from my presentations on YouTube?), and Blogosphere now roll off my tongue.  Andy (Nili’s husband) has been talking to me about how important social media is – and being a part of it all – and encouraging me along – for some time already.  Motti’s pretty “into it” too and as my nieces and nephews.  Me?  Mostly around the edges but not entirely “out of it”.  Not convinced though.

Until yesterday, when watching the news and seeing the same story and the many interesting discussions on TV it generated, everything became oh so clear.

Social media.


I’ve put a wee bit about Twitters and Tweets at the end of the posting if you’re new to this.  First, back to Hilary’s twitters.

Well, according to Ali Akbar Dareni and Nasser Karmi, Associated Press writers:  “TEHRAN, Iran – Iran’s supreme leader sternly warned of a crackdown if protesters continue days of massive street rallies, escalating the government’s showdown with demonstrators demanding a new presidential election. ” Undoubtedly this crackdown would always include cutting people off from communication from outside of Iran, isolating them and hiding from the world what is really happening.  Because of Twitter, however, Iran’s Ayatollah In Chief  (I wonder if we should be comfortable with the politics of any country that has a “Supreme Leader” and they aren’t talking about a back-up group for a MoTown singer) just can’t do that any more.  Newscasts, bereft of the insights and coverage provided by reporters in the field (a tip of the hat to them), are using tweets as the source of their understanding about what’s going on.  They’re even receiving video-clips.  The broadcasters seem to be consistently letting the viewers know that what they’re showing can’t be confirmed but after that they’d run the clip and then have a panel discussion about what they’d just all seen … considering it as “news”.  I see the light and the gloom in this.  Making freedom of speech real through a technological inability to suppress the power of our very human need to talk to each other is fabulous.  Further lowering the standard of the newscasts we get -perhaps by replacing reporters with open-source video clips – makes me shudder.

The thing is that most of us (us meaning those in my age group) sort of poo-poo social media.  In fact, over the last few days every time I’ve been with a group of friends I’ve at one point asked each of them two questions:  (1) Do you have a Facebook page? and (2) Do you have a Twitter account?   Each time it’s led to an interesting conversation that included the general sense that this is all a waste of time.   I starting to think ludditesthat we all have to take a step back … or forward … and realize that this is now the way of the world and if we want to stay connected then, like it or not, we might need to twitter (or at least have a twitter account which you can easily get by going to http://twitter.com).    We have a friend whose mid-80s Jewish mother Zelda has been computer savvy and quite active in several social networks online, sometimes even looking for a good man on J-Date.  My mother and her friend Eleanor met in a computer course.  Those are the role models we need.  Although my frustration – as frequent hair-pulling while trying to figure out how an iMac works or what just happened to that thing that “poof” disappeared from my screen –  with technology is abundantly clear,  in the end I’m starting to think that it’s where we’re – culturally – going and I, for one, don’t want to be left behind.

At the same time I’m worried about all of this.  Why?  I don’t want to be reduced to communications of 140 characters.  I don’t want to talk in what – when I was in government – we called “sound bites“; those pithy things that politicians say that are just the right length for a headline.  I want to have room in my communication to really dig into things; to seek for understanding, to see the nuance in things.  I don’t like abridged versions of novels.  I don’t like the Coles Notes version of anything (do you remember them, they could take a Shakespeare play and bubble it down to under 10 pages; today you get the same sort of thing through SparksNotes online).  I like to sit around – by a fire or by a lake or near a mountain stream – and really talk about thoughts and ideas,  look at them from different perspectives, place them  historically, sees the pros and cons, make connections to other thoughts and ideas.

Sitting writing my blog. Very satisfying. Thinking things through.  Paying attention. Hard to keep up; trying to just keep moving forward.  Living adventure. [133 characters]

Now, as promised, a little more explanation in case you’re new to this … and interested.

What is Twitter? Twitter is a free social twitter tweetnetworking and micro-blogging service that enables its users to send and read each others’ updates, known as tweets. Tweets are text-based posts of up to 140 characters, displayed on the author’s profile page and delivered to other users – known as followers – who have subscribed to them. To give you some idea of how much you can say in a Tweet; the first sentences of this paragraph (the one in brown) is 119 characters.   You’ve got to find a way to communicate using very few words.   Twitter started in 2006 and currently there are about 55 million “hits” each month.

Who’s using Twitter?  Until the last Presidential campaigns I’d have said it was mostly used by edgy, techno-savvy young folks.  Then it was used – pretty effectively it seems – in several U.S. presidential campaigns.  Now it’s being used to fuel resistance to tyranny in Iran.  Even I have a twitter account; I have 7 “friends” there which means that I get their tweets and always know what they’re doing and thinking:  my friends include my son-in-law Andy, my son Josh, Barack Obama, Brent Spiner, Al Gore, my sister Molly, and somebody called Evan Williams who is the man who invented the term “blog” and is the man behind Twitter too.  Actually, all of these bits of information coming in, which are supposed to make me feel connected to these other folks, ends up just making me kind of jumpy as my iPhone keeps buzzing as emails arrive.  I also end up feeling that mostly I can’t – or don’t want to – allow myself to substitute e-friends for the friends you go for a long walk with  … but that’s another story.  Those over 55 million “hits” each month means that lots and lots of people are using it and the numbers seem to grow exponentially.

Facebook and MySpace are sights where people build their own little online “home” in which they keep updates on what they’re doing, sometimes have blogs, upload videos … stay connected with friend).   Facebook has more than 200 million active users, with more than 100 million users logging on at least once each day.  The fastest growing demographic is those 35 years old and older.  More than 1 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photos, etc.) shared each week. Facebook can be translated – on the site – into more than 50 languages and 40 more are in development.  About 70% of Facebook users are outside the United States.  MySpace has mostly 14 to 34 year olds with 350,000 new registrants each day.

YouTube is a video sharing website where users can upload, view and share video clips.  You just go to http://www.youtube.com and then search for whatever it is you’d like to see – a stand-up comedy clip, a brilliant woman speaking, or a clip from a favorite old movie like Inherit the Wind.

Ah – and one last thing.  A Tweeter is a kind of bird.Tweeters This is what it looks like.  All I could find  out about them is that they thrive in Washington State.  Beyond that I got nowhere.  Pretty though.


2 responses to “On Twitters, Tweeters, and tweets

  1. Sharon Griffin

    I too could not quite get what this was all about, until I realized that the way to see pics of my grandkids, great nieces, and extended family, and know what was going on with them, was to join Facebook. I have found it a great way to keep in touch when we’re out of the country, post photos, and mark special family occasions. Nieces and nephews who I barely saw except at weddings and funerals and their children are now part of everyday life. So it does have a purpose – it keeps the extended family in touch. Twittering, however, is still a little beyond me – too worried I’d be putting some comment out there that I hadn’t thought twice about before sending…

    • Sylvia Bereskin

      I find it useful for staying informed about the comings and goings of my nieces and nephew as well. If only I didn’t still feel that adrenalin rush of fear that I’m going to “break it” whenever I did something new on the computer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s